2014-06-09

More Sanity

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/05/internet-users-cannot-be-sued-for-browsing-the-web-ecj-rules?CMP=twt_gu

"The court ruled that browsing and viewing articles online doesn't require authorisation from the copyright holder, settling a row between the PRCA, the industry body for Britain's PR industry, and the Newspaper Licensing Authority (NLA), which had raged for five years. The fight began in a copyright tribunal between media monitoring firm Meltwater and the NLA."

Yeh another ruling providing some sanity and clarity on these issues.
at

3 comments:

  1. frinkMonday 9 June 2014 at 21:36:00 BST

    I find it utterly bizarre that a UK court actually ruled differently. Seriously, they must have either been smoking something, senile, or just incompetent.

    It was just moronic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. frinkTuesday 10 June 2014 at 20:23:00 BST

    Perhaps so, but I'd say then they are still either smoking something, senile or incompetent or perhaps I ought to add corrupt as well? They are not stupid so I'm not sure what else...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated purely to filter out obvious spam, but it means they may not show immediately.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Breaking my heart

One of the things I suffer from is tachycardia. My first memory of this was in secondary school, when I got a flat tyre cycling to school an...

  • It's official, ADSL works over wet string
    Broadband services are a wonderful innovation of our time, using multiple frequency  bands  (hence the name) to carry signals over wires (us...
  • Air conditioning at home (planning permission!)
    For many years I used a small stand-alone air-conditioning unit in my study (the box room in the house) and I even had a hole in the wall fo...
  • EICAR test QR
    It seems there is something of a standard test string for anti virus ( wikipedia has more on this). The idea is that systems that look fo...