tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post2016769583368058807..comments2024-03-28T09:19:27.451+00:00Comments on RevK<sup>®</sup>'s ramblings: Technically correct (@aaisp and 10Gb/s backhaul)RevKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-65400540177371950282016-11-09T07:26:41.316+00:002016-11-09T07:26:41.316+00:00I don't see latencies that low on my slow BTW ...I don't see latencies that low on my slow BTW lines, presumably because of interleaving?Cecil Wardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16477035597238561739noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-43302228774739000672016-11-04T10:43:51.197+00:002016-11-04T10:43:51.197+00:00These are actually the next targets for 10G. We ha...These are actually the next targets for 10G. We have multiple 1G links to transit and peering, but yes, they are the next enemy. The bulk traffic tends to be streaming and so we see a lot via peering. Making these 10G will help a lot. Obviously in the middle it is relatively easy to throw more and more 2Gb/s LNSs in to the mix.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-30158524156654932312016-11-04T10:17:31.882+00:002016-11-04T10:17:31.882+00:00Out of interest Rev, I would be curious to hear a ...Out of interest Rev, I would be curious to hear a bit more from you about peering and transit as a function of congestion as I assume with the good backhaul you provide, they're our main enemies :).Technical Vaulthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06706968838212709673noreply@blogger.com