tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post3157089457498276107..comments2024-03-28T09:19:27.451+00:00Comments on RevK<sup>®</sup>'s ramblings: Good news for privacy - Investigatory Powers Act vs CJEURevKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-15067647477082677162016-12-28T14:20:12.093+00:002016-12-28T14:20:12.093+00:00You don't seriously still rely on the BBC for ...You don't seriously still rely on the BBC for accurate news ? in fact rely on them to publish news stories that don't fit their agenda? BBC is a fake news publisherAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06860744013235846981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-13326019451890620502016-12-24T00:27:44.508+00:002016-12-24T00:27:44.508+00:00Read my other post, as we don't think that is ...Read my other post, as we don't think that is actually allowed by the Act.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-62730882521036272862016-12-23T21:43:42.019+00:002016-12-23T21:43:42.019+00:00Adrian. From my reading of the IP Bill Communicati...Adrian. From my reading of the IP Bill Communications Service Providers can be requested when necessary to start maintaining 12 months of ICRs for user(s) - at this stage all ISPs are not busy installing huge SANs to store all ICR records etc. My question to you is this:<br /><br />Do you think its feasible/likely for them (.gov) to just go higher up the foodchain. E.g All TalkTalk, OpenReach or Virgin backhaul links get snooped. So they see a vast majority of UK unencrypted internet traffic without bothering most ISPs to lift a finger? If so a feeling of "My ISP has never had a warrant so im outside their current reach" might be a false sense of security?<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06708787580827859524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-76009393675774529212016-12-23T06:11:33.757+00:002016-12-23T06:11:33.757+00:00Indeed, they can be very good, and for specific ta...Indeed, they can be very good, and for specific targeted investigations nobody has a real issue with helping them. Just the scope of the IP Act goes so much further than that.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-46096574594125419562016-12-23T03:55:16.463+00:002016-12-23T03:55:16.463+00:00I've been extremely fortunate every time I'...I've been extremely fortunate every time I've dealt with the police. When my father died suddenly the officers who came out were truly worthy of commendation. Twice I've been a victim of minor crime and the local police have been marvellous, indeed on the most recent occasion they sorted the matter out within hours and with zero hassle. Indeed they were defending those who are most vulnerable, and with no jobs worth attitude. On one occasion my employer asked me to help the police, with technical expertise and once the local police came to me personally to ask for my help concerning the internet and examination of computers. On these occasions I got a very favourable impression of their attitude. So it seems I myself have seen nothing but the good. Unfortunately that isn't true for everyone.Cecil Wardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16477035597238561739noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-67835096935875859602016-12-21T19:07:39.887+00:002016-12-21T19:07:39.887+00:00As the Home Office has said that it will not be ma...As the Home Office has said that it will not be making changes, and will defend any claims that DRIPA (bear in mind that the case was not about the IPA) robustly, probably fair to say that there will be no changes to any plans they have around data retention for the time being.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18427000118752159232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-21936007494793396072016-12-21T17:59:51.469+00:002016-12-21T17:59:51.469+00:00Could the ISP that's been served appeal the or...Could the ISP that's been served appeal the order to a non-secret court, in light of the ECJ ruling? (i.e. they may not be allowed to explicitly tell everyone they've been served, but maybe they can ledge a non-secret court case that effectively reveals the order).Steve Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09798286430189689578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-39531354203402672972016-12-21T17:17:52.616+00:002016-12-21T17:17:52.616+00:00On the rare occasions I've ever talked to the ...On the rare occasions I've ever talked to the police they've seem to have spent more time trying to avoid taking action rather than getting on with the job.<br /><br />I was even mugged, dragged up a road by people in a mini-van and subsequently run over by said mini-van. I ended up in hospital with a number of broken ribs (the paramedics were expecting punctured lungs apparently) and ankles that visibly swelled when I finally left hospital and tried to walk again. I was only dragged along though because they tried grabbing my bag and I insisted on holding on.<br /><br />They could have sent the bag away to be tested and examined more closely but apparently decided not to do so because of the time and expense involved in the process.<br /><br />Apparently attempted murder isn't enough to encourage further investigation. <br /><br />Tracking down journalists that happen to be exposing lies of chief constables on the other hand...Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07062406412686949733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-14944255866984162102016-12-21T16:54:20.284+00:002016-12-21T16:54:20.284+00:00Great though this decision is, the IP Act, having ...Great though this decision is, the IP Act, having received Royal Assent, is current UK law. Am I correct in thinking that nothing legally prevents the government from serving a data retention order on any ISP tomorrow (if they haven’t already done so?) and that said ISP would still be prohibited from revealing the fact. They have no intention of amending the act before this case is reheard in the UK Court of Appeal and even if that goes against them I’m sure they’ll find a way drag things out. So until the IPA is actually amended can they not effectively ignore today’s ruling? <br />Please tell me I’m wrong. <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10823387395371201608noreply@blogger.com