tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post5477912870875675690..comments2024-03-29T11:00:39.953+00:00Comments on RevK<sup>®</sup>'s ramblings: NAT is evilRevKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-52286165640644943162016-10-29T08:54:57.803+01:002016-10-29T08:54:57.803+01:00Ill have to look in to that.Ill have to look in to that.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-61508237141090514472016-10-29T02:49:01.958+01:002016-10-29T02:49:01.958+01:00why that 2001:8b0:6464::1 dns not work now? why that 2001:8b0:6464::1 dns not work now? Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15408645764061303493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-9711651463728472552013-11-20T10:49:10.093+00:002013-11-20T10:49:10.093+00:00What a nice blog...I am really very impressed to r...What a nice blog...I am really very impressed to read this..Thanks to admin for posting this nice blog....WOW!!!!!<br />Send Flower Pakistanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04201527870889773578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-54652482547633134622010-08-25T15:19:37.476+01:002010-08-25T15:19:37.476+01:00Should this still work? I tried it on a server of ...Should this still work? I tried it on a server of my own but I see the following on that server:<br /><br />Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address Stat<br />e <br />tcp 0 0 131.211.84.188:80 90.155.53.9:50937 SYN_<br />RECV <br /><br />other port 80 traffic (from the wider ipv4 internet) to that server works nicely.<br /><br />Anyway, pending (and pending.. and pending..) an IPv6 upgrade here it would be nice to be able to experiment with totd.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-10390099066340445662010-03-07T14:01:54.100+00:002010-03-07T14:01:54.100+00:00How about posting some traffic statistics from the...How about posting some traffic statistics from the gateway?Chaz6https://www.blogger.com/profile/09083155096149060543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-23570088538453561842010-03-04T10:58:00.693+00:002010-03-04T10:58:00.693+00:00A hosting company could run a single reverse proxy...A hosting company could run a single reverse proxy on behalf of all of their customers. Their customers would run their sites on IPv6-only servers, and the reverse proxy would allow IPv4-only browsers to get access. That would allow a large number of independent websites to be served with a single IPv4 address. It would even work with SSL if you assume that all browsers support the server name extension (which they don't, but something is going to break whatever you do).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-77886117613805318242010-03-03T14:36:16.866+00:002010-03-03T14:36:16.866+00:00Oooh, predictions. Tricky things. Not sure yet. I ...Oooh, predictions. Tricky things. Not sure yet. I think hosting has to get IPv6 soon. What will you do when you want to host a web server or mail server and the hosting company says they have no IPv4's?<br /><br />We now have kit that can do static mapping, so IPv4+port to IPv6 address.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-44178884361791719122010-03-03T09:32:11.120+00:002010-03-03T09:32:11.120+00:00I can't wait for every last IPv4 address to be...I can't wait for every last IPv4 address to be allocated! That will force people to switch, and then we can get the other benefits of IPv6.<br /><br />What do you think will happen in practice, though? What kind of service will consumer ISPs offer, if they can't even give everyone a dynamically allocated IPv4 address? Will they give them an IPv6 address instead, and do something like your totd service? Will they give everyone a 10.* address and do IPv4 NAT? Will they give them both, and do NAT for IPv4 with direct routing for IPv6? They're in a pretty bad situation because, whatever they do, their clients' systems will break in some way.<br /><br />For hosting, I suppose we will end up deploying some kind of reverse proxy. The actual hosting machines will run IPv6 only. Meanwhile, IPv4 visitors will get to these websites through a dual-stack reverse proxy.<br /><br />As you run an ISP, I would be very interested to know your prediction.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-12937687778401626042010-03-02T23:01:04.866+00:002010-03-02T23:01:04.866+00:00Well.. that is quite impressive :DWell.. that is quite impressive :D1https://www.blogger.com/profile/04266030296611845502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-62871059926399064362010-03-02T22:28:54.857+00:002010-03-02T22:28:54.857+00:00Pity OSX ipv6 support is so bad.
Treating A recor...Pity OSX ipv6 support is so bad.<br /><br />Treating A records as equal priority to AAAA records.. against RFCs but arguable if both are equally valid ways to reach a site.<br /><br />Doing the above when ipv4 is switched off, leading to random loss of connectivity. Epic fail.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-47180594366971137502010-03-02T20:39:39.040+00:002010-03-02T20:39:39.040+00:00Of course that counter's IPv4-only; IPv6 users...Of course that counter's IPv4-only; IPv6 users need not care about it :)Simon Farnsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15190608047563530091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-25366436066122295872010-03-02T19:46:49.004+00:002010-03-02T19:46:49.004+00:00Ha, http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/en-us/index...Ha, http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/en-us/index.html is IPv4 only it seems.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.com