tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post3023722883255520604..comments2024-03-28T09:19:27.451+00:00Comments on RevK<sup>®</sup>'s ramblings: How BT should do it?RevKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-54717754228231125372017-01-27T07:30:44.796+00:002017-01-27T07:30:44.796+00:00Just not sure it works in all cases.Just not sure it works in all cases.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-53270491817421419822017-01-27T02:12:10.754+00:002017-01-27T02:12:10.754+00:00You seem to have missed the whole "unbundling...You seem to have missed the whole "unbundling" thing.Kennybobshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07093672022261267772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-34359496165770237112011-07-17T14:31:00.728+01:002011-07-17T14:31:00.728+01:00Yeh, FTTP has one NTE, but BT charge the voice pro...Yeh, FTTP has one NTE, but BT charge the voice provider and internet provider both for the access unless the same company. This is the whole point. If the end user paid for access you could easily have multiple voice and network providers on FTTP at lower costs, and even pay as go providers. You can also switch provider, and do trials and all sorts without lead times, minimum terms and set up costs.RevKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-69505688939454069332011-07-17T14:03:10.928+01:002011-07-17T14:03:10.928+01:00>Perhaps you could sell it by involving a BT lo...>Perhaps you could sell it by involving a BT logo on the NTE <br /><br />Exactly what there is on the FTTP NTE. Actually it says Openreach in case I get confused with BT Retail.Starkickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13912104970994162543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-82224351489248532212011-07-15T17:40:21.017+01:002011-07-15T17:40:21.017+01:00Those are very concise, accurate and sensible thin...Those are very concise, accurate and sensible things to propose. I think it's the same as the model in France.<br /><br />The only thing I'd change is to add some EU or SP stats reporting to the CPE.Poggshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14126068841610295565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-8136974294473341462011-07-13T12:35:32.616+01:002011-07-13T12:35:32.616+01:00This is what's known as "Doing things rig...This is what's known as "Doing things right".<br />It would be inconceivable for this to actually come about for all sorts off nonsense reasons:<br /><br /> + It's too "complicated" / customers would never understand it.<br /> - Clearly lies as they understood it when it was dialup.<br /><br /> + This is a "business class" product and must therefore be more expensive.<br /> - Clearly most of this can be motivated by cost savings to BT in terms of support.<br /><br /> + This is actually a really good idea and therefore BT must make it expensive because it is flexible.<br /> - We have something that "works" (i.e. the business ends up making some money somehow rather than it actually achieving any technical goals).<br /><br /><br /><br />Perhaps you could sell it by involving a BT logo on the NTE so that people actually understood that BT were still a "good thing" and a useful brand to them. Most people don't realise that BT still almost always do all the heavy lifting no matter which telco/ISP you actually pay.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-61151333414720444862011-07-13T09:33:23.527+01:002011-07-13T09:33:23.527+01:00"there is no issue over SFI charges and all t..."there is no issue over SFI charges and all that crap" is precisely why they won't do it.<br /><br />SFI is a nice little earner.Tony Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03697664015360179933noreply@blogger.com