tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post4956037084168044254..comments2024-03-28T09:19:27.451+00:00Comments on RevK<sup>®</sup>'s ramblings: Boiler plate text on emailsRevKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369263214193333422noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-20341649701345005732017-06-09T18:39:04.109+01:002017-06-09T18:39:04.109+01:00A Google image search for "do not throw stone...A Google image search for "do not throw stones at this notice" throws up some beauts.Twelfth Knighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00686443308099050903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-82994095305983897102017-06-09T16:21:24.425+01:002017-06-09T16:21:24.425+01:00Some emails carry dire warnings and instructions o...Some emails carry dire warnings and instructions on what to do "if you are not the intended recipient"<br /><br />Clearly, in one interpretation, if it's in your mailbox you ARE the intended recipient.<br />Chrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-15817461095696773512017-06-09T15:16:58.155+01:002017-06-09T15:16:58.155+01:00My layman's guess is that it's not relevan...My layman's guess is that it's not relevant - Thornton v SLP had you take action in accordance with the contract terms posted before they applied, whereas reading and forwarding without permission, and doing nothing else, does not have you acting in accordance with the posted terms.Simon Farnsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15190608047563530091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-16847406127613073132017-06-09T09:40:29.287+01:002017-06-09T09:40:29.287+01:00For some reason, it brings to mind the old joke ab...For some reason, it brings to mind the old joke about the sign in the park saying "do not throw stones at this notice", that same level of stupidityCecil Wardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16477035597238561739noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-89223913483424581322017-06-09T07:07:20.653+01:002017-06-09T07:07:20.653+01:00Goodness knows - as Adrian shows, it needs unpicki...Goodness knows - as Adrian shows, it needs unpicking on several levels to try and make sense of the situation.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18427000118752159232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-86580996065995915792017-06-09T00:47:03.500+01:002017-06-09T00:47:03.500+01:00Is Thorton v Shoe Lane Parking relevant here Neil?...Is Thorton v Shoe Lane Parking relevant here Neil?Chad Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06466797076721870606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-27684164163983884072017-06-09T00:46:46.359+01:002017-06-09T00:46:46.359+01:00Is Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking perhaps relevant h...Is Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking perhaps relevant here Neil?Chad Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06466797076721870606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-38562633975571999522017-06-08T16:47:12.782+01:002017-06-08T16:47:12.782+01:0099% of lawyers give the others a bad name :(99% of lawyers give the others a bad name :(Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18427000118752159232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-26963907284131438712017-06-08T14:25:01.585+01:002017-06-08T14:25:01.585+01:00These things are totally unenforceable anyway. If ...These things are totally unenforceable anyway. If I have sent you an email in error, then that is exactly what I have done. You can't be prohibited from doing whatever you want with it. IANAL.Tonynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-19534764309802407512017-06-08T12:33:39.413+01:002017-06-08T12:33:39.413+01:00Not to mention these disclaimers always appear at ...Not to mention these disclaimers always appear at the bottom of the emails, so assuming you do read them you've already read the full message anyway!<br /><br />Maybe they all secretly want to be 007, and it's lawyer speak for "For your eyes only"<br /><br />On a serious note though, I wonder if it would even hold up in court? "You breached my client confidentiality", "Yes I sent it to someone else, but I attached a note to the bottom of it telling them not to read it"Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04311149395810537121noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3993498847203183398.post-91629259482943087762017-06-08T12:18:27.005+01:002017-06-08T12:18:27.005+01:00Because they majored in law, not logic and are ter...Because they majored in law, not logic and are terrified of being hoist on the petard of beached client confidentiality.nowtotallyhackedoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06687184924812362495noreply@blogger.com