2013-07-03

Spammers 0:2 RevK

So, the other spammer paid up.


And the solicitors for Huxley have said they have sent £30 by BACS.

What more can I say :-)
at

5 comments:

  1. galoophWednesday 3 July 2013 at 13:31:00 BST

    Result!

    ReplyDelete
  2. gr0mitWednesday 3 July 2013 at 14:35:00 BST

    Revk could you automate the process? From spam email to MCOL court submission?!

    ReplyDelete
  3. gr0mitWednesday 3 July 2013 at 14:36:00 BST

    Revk could you automate the process? From spam email to MCOL court submission?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ben CliffordWednesday 3 July 2013 at 16:22:00 BST

    gr0mit: like how you've automated your question asking process?

    ReplyDelete
  5. SimonFWednesday 3 July 2013 at 17:46:00 BST

    In the immortal style of Slashdot:

    1. Sue spammers
    2. Profit.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated purely to filter out obvious spam, but it means they may not show immediately.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

TOTSCO 66 is guidance, optional

I feel I need to explain this. The TOTSCO call today, first I have been on, and wow! But a key point was TOTSCO bulletin 66, which is actual...

  • It's official, ADSL works over wet string
    Broadband services are a wonderful innovation of our time, using multiple frequency  bands  (hence the name) to carry signals over wires (us...
  • Air conditioning at home (planning permission!)
    For many years I used a small stand-alone air-conditioning unit in my study (the box room in the house) and I even had a hole in the wall fo...
  • EICAR test QR
    It seems there is something of a standard test string for anti virus ( wikipedia has more on this). The idea is that systems that look fo...