The SIM is clever, it has multiple IMSIs allowing it to work in various zones, and have cheap calls. In some cases it does a call back for outgoing calls (I assume their interconnect makes that cheaper somehow).
It is advertised as coming with a UK and US number. The US number has to be requested (simple process) and has a 25c/min incoming call rate, which is (as I understand it) consistent with the way US mobile numbers work.
However, the UK number is free to receive calls in the UK and during the week in most of Europe as well, which is nice for roaming.
So, what's the con?
Well, obviously, I was not fooled for a second by the "Calls to X countries, from 1p/min". As expected only one country on the list (USA) is 1p/min and the rest are all a lot more. But this was not actually a lie, much like the use of "up to" in other contexts.
The catch is that it is not a UK number. The number starts 074520 (or +4474520 if you like). WorldSIM argue that as it starts +447 it is "considered a UK number".
Well, it is not, simple as that. It is not actually a UK number, and not "considered a UK number" by any carrier from which you can call it.
It is a Manx number. Isle of Man is not in UK, and, more importantly, anyone calling this number does not find their telco "considers it to be a UK number" for charging purposes - they charge more. E.g. weekend BT main call rates for UK mobiles is 3.406p/min but for this Manx mobile it is 16.8p/min. A big difference for those calling me. Similar (or worse) differences exist with other carriers.
It is a cunning con, as they don't publish rates to call the number - you would not expect them to as it is (a) not a premium number and (b) down to the telco you are using to make the call. However, saying (incorrectly) that it is a "UK number" implies to the customer that it is in fact a "UK number" and so is normal rates for callers to call the "UK number", which is not true.
It is therefore, in my opinion, a con. And BA should not advertise it as having a UK number, and neither should WorldSIM. Trading standards seem uninclined to take up the matter, sadly.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Companies bad at banking
I was discussing with a colleague the other day how so many companies are so bad with banking. In some ways we have been lucky, but to be fa...
Broadband services are a wonderful innovation of our time, using multiple frequency bands (hence the name) to carry signals over wires (us...
For many years I used a small stand-alone air-conditioning unit in my study (the box room in the house) and I even had a hole in the wall fo...
It seems there is something of a standard test string for anti virus ( wikipedia has more on this). The idea is that systems that look fo...
Sounds like another one of your emails to the ASA is required :)ReplyDelete
As you say they advertise it as a UK number when it is not. WikiPedia, as always, as a lot to say on the matter
This has been the case for years. It's no different though to Jersey/Guernsey having 07 and 01 numbers and neither of those being treated as "UK" for the purposes of "inclusive" in allowances and the like.ReplyDelete
I've not ever seen a roaming SIM (there are loads) that offers anything else. However in my case, I just use them for data (no idea if yours includes this), and don't care about the number, and use my normal phone/sim - Roaming Charges to me are less hassle than messing around.
Hi there, toggle mobile's numbers are proper UK numbers. I called them from my Three contract and it comes out of my minutes allowance.ReplyDelete
They are hardly the only company to be guilty of passing off Manx Telecom numbers as UK mobile numbers...but yeah, it's a bit naughty.ReplyDelete
It's also no worse than the (yes, STILL) fairly common practice of referring to 084x numbers as "Local Rate"ReplyDelete