Peter McGhie, Phase DSCS / Phase Broadcast

Bit of a waste of time - going 400+ miles to Falkirk and the pursuer did not even turn up. Oddly court said most we could claim on expenses / costs was £70. Thanks to Phil for going.

Obviously, as always, this is just my personal, honestly held, opinion of these matters. I'll be happy to correct any factual errors.

The case was pursued by "Phase DSCS (UK) LLC", a fictitious company not listed in Companies House. After much chasing we had an email from Peter McGhie stating that it was "Phase DSCS (UK) Ltd" that was actually suing us (company SC502663) which was incorporated April 2015, but the case was about us supposedly failing to provide broadband adequately in 2014! Obviously we had provided broadband to someone, and fixed faults when reported. He claims the service never worked and was rejected and not put in use even though, on one of the lines, the only fault report was 7 months after installation, no fault seen by us or found by BT and service was heavily used with no apparent issues for nearly a year in total. Clearly, in my view, trying it on. He was claiming nearly £3000 even though we have a limit of liability clause very clearly on the order form and terms.

One of the real issues here is that this guy tries to hide the identity of the legal entity in question, or so it seems. The letterhead does not say the name of a sole trader or partners, or the name of a Limited company or a company number. When asked directly for company name or number he will often not say - it took ages to get him to state the company Phase DSCS (UK) Ltd having put a bogus company name on the summons.

But who is Peter McGhie? Who is "Phase"? The clues are not hard to find on Facebook and twitter, and it seems to me that he is a one man band - he is director of Phase DSCS (UK) Ltd and was director of Phase Broadcast Ltd which he dissolved in Jan 2015. He claims to be Scotland & North Region but there is no indication of any other "region".

The best bit of bullshit is "PHASE DSCS are Agents to HM Government & Authorities". What the hell is that meant to mean? He uses the (old) government security classifications on letters and emails to look impressive.

But just look at the letterhead - he looks all very fancy, and even uses the royal arms in the background (a breach of the Trade Marks Act 1994 if you don't have permission from the Queen). He quotes four NQA registrations for various ISO certifications, but NQA tell us that he does not have any. He also quotes UKAS.

His address is "Bonnybridge Engineering Centre", but that appears to simply be his garage. Not 100% sure, but I think it is this one. From the address, it is likely to be one just like this if not this specific one.

Bonnybridge Engineering Centre, maybe?
Sadly we had no chance to actually defend this in court or counter claim (if he had got the pursuer changed to him personally, we could have, as he still exists). We have been trying to claim early £300 for unpaid invoices, and been thwarted by the lack of clarity on who exactly contracted with us.

What was interesting was when I looked up the replacement for Business Names Act which is now part of The Companies Act 2016, I found clause 1206. It looks like it was almost written for this case - where someone in breach of 1202 is suing someone over a contract breach and the defender has a counter claim that they have been unable to pursue because of the breach, the case must be dismissed. That is exactly what is happening to us.

We'll have to investigate the issue of costs more.

If you have dealings with this man or anyone like him, it is well worth looking for warning signs and being extremely cautious dealing with anyone that refuses to properly identify their legal entity.

We've reported him to NQA, UKAS, Trading Standards, Companies House, the Cabinet Office (who seem to handle the royal arms), and the Police.

I am very disappointed that it seems one cannot even get the simple cost of traveling to the court when a case is dismissed like this. I do hope Phil had a good time though.

I am also very disappointed that the court process has no way to make an application for a judge to preview the details of the case. The fact the pursuer was a company that could not have done the things in the statement of claim should have allowed the case to be dismissed without a hearing. But there seems to be no such process.

P.S. When we first started A&A, we actually had dealings with the MoD, when I worked from my garage at home. We actually had a meeting with a Major in our dining room in the house once, with my wife making cups of tea. Difference is that I did not pretend we were anything otherwise.

Update: (3rd July) the actual order "extract of dismissal" orders payment of £290 in expenses (10% of the claim). Yay...


  1. I have no joke, I just like saying "Tranismission Officer"

  2. Of course, if they're VAT registered, their "agents of HM Government" statement is legitimate (but still meaningless bullshit).

  3. Perhaps the entire intention was solely to waste your time and money and he/they never had any intention of turning up?
    Basically if you turn up then he gets the satisfaction of knowing that he has wasted your time and money and that what you can try and claim back is very limited. If you don't turn up then he can try and get some kind of default judgement in your absence.
    I presume that the costs of filing such a case are negligible in Scotland as they were in England last time that I looked?

    1. The cost to file is trivial, the rewards if decree is granted (winning by default, if A&A had not been represented) would be the full sum sought - £3000 here.

      The limit on expenses can actually be waived where the case was vexatious, but you have to ask for that specifically.

  4. Now isn't this strange - the Facebook page you linked has disappeared! I wonder why that could be?

  5. I met him once when I was doing some software patches at a radio station in Clydebank. He had a high vis jacket with a back patch saying 'CNI Agent' with utility belt and motorola radio hanging off the lapel. Took me a few minutes to work out what CNI stood for. The guy is in Lala land....Thinks he's NCIS... Also saw some paperwork where he describes Phase(whatever its called this week) as an OFCOM Authorised Transmission Provider.. BS I used to work for OFCOM and they never have had 'Authorised Transmission Providers'.

  6. Based upon his 2014/5 website, I phoned West Mercia Police to ask whether they did indeed "regulate" Phase. They were most interested to discover the claim. Oddly enough, that web site disappeared shortly afterwards......

  7. Perhaps if he is trading you may wish to enquire of Companies House why he filed dormant company accounts to 30/4/16


  8. I have come across this guy in a related field recently. From what I have seen he should be behind bars. I cannot say much for obvious reasons. If your search has brought you here as it did for me, you know to be careful.

  9. He is a pathologic liar with a big delusion of greatness. He easily breaks the law and will hurt you with no remorse. He works alone in his garage, and will try to sell you he works for a big corporate company named PHASE DSCS (Wired telecommunications activities). Don't make him any questions about him or his company, because he will start to be aggressive. He doesn't want to be caught in his lies. He will threat you easily as he threatened me. He is broken, so don't even think to give him credit. Stay away of this narcissist guy. I agree with Anonymous, he should be behind bars!!!

  10. https://www.linkedin.com/in/petermcghie/?originalSubdomain=uk

    for your entertainment.

    If you come across Phase DSCS challenge there BS

    The Scottish Walter Mitty

  11. 'PHASE DSCS (UK) Ltd' was dissolved last year, presumably to escape angry customers. The new version which has been registered is 'PHASE DSCS (UK & INTL) LLP'. Watch out!

  12. Hilarious - just checked his LinkedIn and see he is now a self professed Commander of the Guatemala special forces and leads black ops missions

    1. This is the RIGHT reason to reopen an antique blog post / thread :)

    2. He claims to be involved in the 'Fight against Corruption'. He certainly knows about corruption...


Comments are moderated purely to filter out obvious spam, but it means they may not show immediately.

TOTSCO 66 is guidance, optional

I feel I need to explain this. The TOTSCO call today, first I have been on, and wow! But a key point was TOTSCO bulletin 66, which is actual...