Whats the issue with SFI charges?
As discussed with our favourite telco today the issue is when we say we are not at fault (and neither is our customer) but they say they are not at fault (using their limited diagnostic tests) and we reach an impasse?
So - we, and our customer, are prepared to go to the master socket where the service is delivered by sending a replacement router and testing with that. Even replacement splitter and cables. We are prepared to do that with no risk to them.
But our favourite telco are not prepared to go to the master socket without making a risk to us, currently of £144+VAT.
That is where it is wrong!
After all, we do offer them our standard fault investigation service to resolve the empass, at a mere £144+VAT, where we send pre-configured router and splitter and so on and do on-line ATM tests and all sorts. But for some reason they never want to buy that service from us?
They are being stubborn and refusing to resolve the empass and meet us at the master socket.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Angles Mort
I saw this on a truck (non UK plates), and they do puzzle me a bit. For a start, it is not clear - are the black bits the death angles - in ...
-
Broadband services are a wonderful innovation of our time, using multiple frequency bands (hence the name) to carry signals over wires (us... -
The ASR33, like most teletypes of the era, works at a fixed rate. It does 10 characters per second. It is 110 Baud, using 1 start, 8 data (i...
-
I am using KiCad for PCB design, and it is pretty impressive, but KiCad version 6 has just been released. There are lots of small changes, b...
I've said it before: FavTelco is simply not interested in providing wholesale access to their broadband network and are trying to make it as difficult as possible for any other ISP to use.
ReplyDelete