It seems "big brother" may be inevitable. During the debate on the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers bill last night, Jack Straw stated:-
"They have to be able to access everybody’s data records in order to find
those of one particular person, because the police, no more than the
rest of us, are not given powers of clairvoyance with which to
anticipate who is and who is not to be a suspect."
This clearly shows an attitude that everyone should be tracked and monitored and logged just in case they turn out to be a suspect later.
This is the very thing that the European Court found problematic when considering a basic right to privacy. We have a right to privacy.
This attitude has police state and big brother written all over it. When will it end? When will the people for which these MPs work (us!) tell them we would rather have privacy than a police state and suspicion of everyone?
My air-con can have a temperature set and aim for it. It has a wide range of ± a few degrees which I don't like. It is not setting tempe...
Broadband services are a wonderful innovation of our time, using multiple frequency bands (hence the name) to carry signals over wires (us...
For many years I used a small stand-alone air-conditioning unit in my study (the box room in the house) and I even had a hole in the wall fo...
It seems there is something of a standard test string for anti virus ( wikipedia has more on this). The idea is that systems that look fo...